The cycles of mankind

Before I start explaining the next cycle I think I need to further elaborate on why states are inherently religious. And what I mean by state (dictionary definition): of or relating to the central civil government or authority. Meaning, when people gather up they form a state. A state can be a nation, a trade union, a monastic organization, or a one-world government. Religion comes in layers; every generation updates religious traditions by either adopting something new or discarding something old. This should be obvious to everyone who has studied Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. If you open the first page of the Bible you quickly notice that stories of genesis are ancient and have little to do with modern Judaism. Moses is the first character who we can find relevant in all three major religions: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. And he even doesn't appear in genesis! Yet Adam and Eve, Cain and Abel, Noah, and the descents of Abraham are known by everyone. The reason ...

 While my wife grammar checked my previous blog she asked "where does value 309.6 come from?" The short answer is: I don't know. Martin Armstrong has come up with this value in his blog and didn't go into details, so I can't tell his deeper reasoning. If you are interested you can always contact him and ask. His staff is very active and replied to me on the same day when I asked permission to refer to his research. Indeed, one of the purposes of my blog is either to prove or disprove his theory about religion cycle and cycles generally (yes, religion cycle is only the first cycle I will dig into), that humanity's religious and other values change in forecastable cycles. The long answer is: I can speculate. Martin didn't come only up with value 309.6, but also value 212 which is the final peak of the religion cycle. Again I don't know how he reached this conclusion, I am here only observing and repeating. From his blog: https://www.armstrongec...